[ad_1]
\n<\/p>\n
Prayagraj (UP): The Allahabad High Court has stated that if small disputes in a marriage are viewed as \u201ccruelty\u201d by courts under divorce law, then many marriages would get dissolved even if there is no actual cruelty by either spouse.<\/p>\n
A division bench, comprising Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh and Justice Shiv Shanker Prasad, made this observation while directing the judicial separation of an estranged married couple instead of directly allowing a plea for divorce.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf courts were to recognize and act on small disputes or occurrences and read them as completion of ingredients of cruelty, many marriage where parties may not be enjoying best relations may stand exposed to dissolution without any real cruelty being committed,\u201d it said.<\/p>\n
In the present case, the couple got married in 2013. The husband submitted that the wife refused to consummate their marriage, fought with his parents and once instigated a mob to chase him by calling him a thief.<\/p>\n
She also filed a dowry case against him.<\/p>\n
He submitted that they lived together until July 2014, but did not cohabit thereafter and sought divorce from a family court citing cruelty by the wife.<\/p>\n
Meanwhile, the wife accused the man of having an illicit relationship with his sister-in-law.<\/p>\n
After the family court declined to allow the husband\u2019s plea for divorce, he moved an appeal before high court.<\/p>\n
The high court said that in order to constitute marital cruelty, the act has to be serious enough to hinder any efforts at reconciliation.<\/p>\n
It also noted that the wife had only alleged that her husband was having an affair because he slept in the same room as his sister-in-law and her children.<\/p>\n
Inferring an illicit relationship on the basis of this aspect alone would not be justified, the court said.<\/p>\n
All the same, the HC proceeded to allow the parties to separate, instead of dissolving the marriage at the present stage. Consequently, the court granted a decree of judicial separation to the appellant-husband.<\/p>\n
(IANS)<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n