[ad_1]
\n<\/p>\n
The AAP supremo had challenged in the top court the April 9 order of the Delhi High Court that had upheld his arrest in the case.<\/p>\n
The high court had upheld Kejriwal\u2019s arrest in the case, saying there was no illegality about it and that the ED was left with \u201clittle option\u201d after he skipped repeated summonses and refused to join the investigation.<\/span><\/p>\n On June 20, Arvind Kejriwal was granted bail by a trial court in Delhi on a personal bond of Rs 1 lakh in the case. However, the ED had moved the Delhi High Court the next day and contended that the trial court\u2019s order granting bail to Kejriwal was \u201cperverse\u201d, \u201cone-sided\u201d and \u201cwrong-sided\u201d and that the findings were based on irrelevant facts.<\/span><\/p>\n Arvind Kejriwal\u2019s Arrest | Timeline Of Key Events<\/strong><\/p>\n After getting arrested by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with its money laundering probe linked to the alleged excise or liquor policy scam on March 21, Arvind Kejriwal was sent to judicial custody and was lodged in Delhi\u2019s Tihar jail for the same.<\/span><\/p>\n The high court, on June 21, imposed an interim stay on the trial court\u2019s bail order till the passing of an order on ED\u2019s application for interim relief. On June 25, the high court passed a detailed order staying the trial court order.<\/span><\/p>\n Kejriwal was also arrested by the CBI on June 26 in connection with the corruption case related to the alleged excise policy scam.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n [ad_2] [ad_1] The AAP supremo had challenged in the top court the April 9 order of the Delhi High Court that had upheld his arrest in the case. The high court had upheld Kejriwal\u2019s arrest in the case, saying there was no illegality about it and that the ED was left with \u201clittle option\u201d after he […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":32130,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34525","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-nation"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/thenftimes.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Delhi-excise-policy-No-relief-for-Arvind-Kejriwal-Supreme-Court-issues-notice-to-ED.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenftimes.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34525","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenftimes.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenftimes.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenftimes.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenftimes.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34525"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/thenftimes.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34525\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":34526,"href":"https:\/\/thenftimes.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34525\/revisions\/34526"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenftimes.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/32130"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thenftimes.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34525"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenftimes.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34525"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thenftimes.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34525"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"